Since the Fukushima catastrophe, leaders of
the nuclear industry have uttered many apologies and promises to improve
safety, and concrete steps have been taken to do this. But there have also been
many shrugs and instances of surprising disregard for the concerns of victims.
If the threshold of safety used to be 5 mSv/year, now it is 20, but don’t
worry, they say, stay where you are and carry on with your lives. They give the
clear impression sometimes that they think level 7 accidents actually aren’t
such a big deal. Even if one happens every ten or twenty years, they seem to be
telling the world that nuclear is still worthwhile and necessary.
Soon after the Fukushima catastrophe, Hans
Blix, former director general of the IAEA, said, “Fukushima is a bump in
the road and will also lead to a further strengthening of the safety of nuclear
power.” In 1986, shortly after the Chernobyl catastrophe, Blix’s underling at
the IEAE, head of nuclear safety Morris Rosen, said, “Even if
an accident of this kind occurred every year, I would consider nuclear power an
attractive source of energy.” This is after all, a capitalist enterprise. Nuclear
energy has always had an other-worldly, magical status which made us believe
that governments would treat it with utmost care and security. But it turns out
that it is managed just like the oil industry, the financial sector or any
other segment of the economy.
Last month (June 2013) there was a disaster
at sea that went relatively unreported, considering its overall awesomeness.
The incident could serve as a metaphor for how risk is managed in the nuclear
industry, as well as many others.
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries makes outsized
cargo ships that, we now know, can break up in rough seas. There was always the
chance that one would break in the middle and leave thousands of shipping
containers slowly sinking in the sea. The MOL
Comfort broke in two in the Indian Ocean in an accident which was
unprecedented for a ship of this scale, with half of the ship sinking quickly
while the other half was towed away, eventually catching fire and also sinking
before it reached safe harbor. What looked like a colossal engineering failure
can also be viewed as a well-calculated risk worth taking. Mitsubishi could
make smaller ships, but over a long period of time, the shipping industry will
be more profitable if it uses these enormous ships, even if the cost of the
occasional sinking is accounted for, and of course the environmental damage is
ignored as what economists call “an externality.”
This metaphor holds up if indeed the MOL Comfort
sinking was an accident. Although it broke up in very rough seas, there have
been rumors on blogs that it was loaded with a large shipment of arms supplied
by the US for Syrian rebel forces. Commenters on blogs have noted that it wouldn’t
take a missile strike to break the ship. A submarine could pass underneath and
release blasts of air that would disturb the buoyancy of the ship and induce
stress fractures. Alternatively, a bomb could be detonated several meters below
the ship and the shock wave would do the damage, unnoticed by the crew on board.
Or perhaps it wasn’t weapons for rebels but rather that terrorist nuke in a
shipping container that we have been warned about for years. The US government
might have learned about it and sunk the MOL
Comfort as a pre-emptive measure.
All such rumors are completely unverifiable.
It’s hard to imagine that any investigative journalist is going to get a look
at the ship's manifest, and that would not likely tell the truth about the cargo
if it was indeed what the rumors claim. The relative neglect by the media fans
the flames of speculation, but then the neglect probably stems from the fact
that no one died and the incident happened far from shore. The builder, the
shipping company and the insurance companies are content to see this sinking
get as little attention as possible. Yet there is something grotesque and
awesome about these images of the fuel, the monstrous ship, and 4,500 cargo
containers going to the bottom of the sea. I would have thought this would be big news.
No comments:
Post a Comment