French Polynesia and other Pacific Island Nations Join the Marshall Islands in the ICJ Case against Nuclear Weapon States

Polynesian independence party Tavini charges France with crimes against humanity

A translation of

Jean-Pierre Viatge, «Nucléaire : le Tavini vise la France pour "crime contre l’humanité"» Tahiti Infos, 2016/02/29

Papeete, Tahiti, February 29, 2016: The Polynesian independence party Tavini Huiraatira is submitting a complaint in international court against France for crimes against humanity. The complaint concerns the 193 nuclear bomb tests conducted on Moruroa and Fangataufa until 1996.

The Marshall Islands submitted complaints at The International Court of Justice in The Hague in 2014 against the United States, Russia, France, the United Kingdom and China for flagrant violation of the Non-Proliferation Treaty, which was signed by these countries in 1968. India, North Korea, Israel and Pakistan are named as well, as they too are nuclear-armed states.

Memorial to the victims of nuclear bomb tests in Papeete, Tahiti

However, as it is explained by Moetai Brotherson, a power broker for Tavini Huiraatira, this procedure should be seen as a bare minimum of what should be done. In fact, the second stage of the plan is being prepared. It will take the form of a collective procedure to file a case of crimes against humanity at the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague. Numerous complaints will be submitted before October 2016 and delivered collectively by Pacific island nations that were victimized by nuclear bomb tests. The complaint brought by the Marshall Islands is one of these.

The claims of Polynesians against France will, in this case, be one of these complaints brought by Pacific island nations. Moetai Brotherson and Richard Tuheiava are to be in New York on March 12, 2016 for a one-week mission at the United Nations where they will be lobbying intensively. They have scheduled fifteen meetings with member nations that already support the 2013 resolution for Polynesia to be re-listed as a non-autonomous territory on a path to decolonization. They plan to refine this “class action” resolution before moving forward with it.

The objective is to have the series of complaints submitted to the ICC as soon as possible so that the resolution adopted by the UN decolonization commission can enter it into the record next October.

As for the goal of these complaints of crimes against humanity, Moetai Brotherson says the facts speak for themselves: 46 atmospheric tests, out of 193 in total, conducted in the Pacific between 1966 and 1996. He says, “The classified status of the archives proves that the State has something to hide…” Speaking of the 1,000 applications for compensation for radiation-induced illnesses, submitted under the provisions of the Morin Law, he adds, “Today they admit some known deaths without mentioning all the deaths we know nothing of. We will show that the French State knew, before the tests, about the risks of contamination. This was not involuntary homicide…”

In New York, the calendar for the fourth commission in charge of decolonization consists of a preparatory meeting in June for the plenary session in mid-October. At that time the final draft of the resolution will be prepared for presentation before the General Assembly in December.

For Polynesian sovereigntists, the goal of such action in international arenas is to deliver a sort of “electroshock” Paris, to make the French government take the issue seriously. Since May 17, 2013, the date when Polynesia was put on the UN list of countries to be decolonized, independence activists have denounced France’s “empty chair” policy at the UN headquarters in New York. A member of Tavini explains, “Now that we are re-listed, there should be a discussion among all the parties involved on the challenges of decolonization. The history of the nuclear tests is one of the legacies of colonialism, and education and the management of natural resources are other major issues.”

It is unclear whether the presence of Edouard Fritch* [current president of French Polynesia] will change the given situation at the UN next October. The president of French Polynesia confirmed for Tahiti Infos, on February 18th., that he wished to speak for supporters of Polynesian independence before the UN decolonization commission. In an exclusive interview, he affirmed, “For the time being, our privileged partner is the French State. Polynesians know very well that our problems won’t be solved in New York [at the UN].”

But for Oscar Temaru, president of Tavini Huiraatira, things are happening elsewhere now that the process at the UN has begun. He says, “It is the State that can’t admit it, that isn’t responding to this resolution which requires France to begin the process of decolonization.”

When it comes to the nuclear legacy, the independence leader is categorical. Two weeks ago he explained, “We cannot find a solution with the State [France] because the State judges itself. An international tribunal must take it up. That’s why this case must be delivered… We have discussed this with the Marshall Islands. They had similar problems with the United States.” Last Tuesday he called on the representatives at Tarahoi [a term for the French Polynesian legislature] to work together to draft an indictment against the State to make it stand trial in an international tribunal.

This action at the ICC will take form in a few days in New York, thanks to the support of several Pacific island states. It will nonetheless be a challenge. When French president Francois Hollande was in Tahiti recently [February 2016] he declared, “In the UN system, it is thus: A tiny state and a nation of a billion citizens are equal. Each has one vote.”

* Continental France (referred to as le métropole) has a very centralized government structure. It is not a federation of states or provinces, but each former colony is now called a Collectivité d'outre-mer (overseas collectivity) which does have a status similar to states or provinces in a federation. Collectivities have a higher degree of autonomy than departments and regions within le métropole. French Polynesia has its own legislature and president, but citizens there are full French citizens with representation in the French national assembly and senate. National security and defense are still managed entirely by the Republic of France. The current president of Polynesia is committed to keeping Polynesia a part of France. Independence parties and coalitions are large and influential, but out of power at present. Conservative leaders with affinities for France have tended to want to sweep the nuclear legacy aside, while those in favor of independence have fought for justice, compensation of victims and more education about Polynesian culture before and during colonization, and especially about the recent history of the nuclear bomb testing era.

My translation of this article was originally published on DiaNuke.

Idiocracy, nucleocracy

Donald Trump’s infamous campaign for president has coincided with the 10th anniversary of the crude satirical film Idiocracy, an event which prompted its co-writer Etan Cohen to comment on twitter “I never expected Idiocracy to become a documentary.” Indeed, some to the utterances of Donald Trump and his supporters rival the stunning idiocy portrayed in the film.

Mike Judge (director), Idiocracy, Twentieth Century Fox, 2006

The story begins with army private Joe Bauer who has been chosen for a special military project because he is perfectly average, having an IQ of exactly 100. Along with a female specimen, the army puts him to sleep for a year in a suspended animation experiment, but the program is shut down after he is put in the box, and he is forgotten. When his container falls from a garbage heap 500 years later and pops open, he finds himself in a post-apocalyptic world where all the intelligent work is done by machines and humans have gone through an extreme dumbing-down process. Everyone Joe encounters finds him to be suspiciously much too smart, talking way too fancy with his “fag talk.” But he eventually comes to the attention of the president, who is also a moron but just smart enough to realize that Joe might have an idea about how to make the crops grow again. They nourish the crops with sports drinks promoted by agribusiness, and Joe helps them figure out they should use water, “like they use in the toilet.” He’s the smartest person in the world.

The story’s resemblance to the Trump campaign has been picked up by numerous writers who have recently celebrated the virtues of the sleeper hit that went straight to DVD in 2006, after a short run in cinemas, and went on to earn millions of dollars for 20th Century Fox.

One commentary on Alternet took exception to the film’s suggestion that the dumbing-down of society was due to the declining frequency of genes for intelligence. The opening sequence shows a couple with high IQs explaining their reasons for delaying having children, and then failing to have children later when they eventually wanted them. This is contrasted with characters living in poverty who are breeding like rabbits, and thus the decline of civilization is put down to the reversal of the traditional rule of the survival of the fittest and the most intelligent.

However, if one listens carefully to the narration and dialog, a more sympathetic interpretation is possible. Genes for intelligence are never mentioned, and we could assume that the high-IQ couple became intelligent because of the social capital of their families and the society they grew up in. The theory of evolution includes the theory of cultural evolution that holds that those whose heritage is good education and a developed social consciousness will thrive and contribute to building a thriving society. Genes play only a small part in human potential.

The critique expressed by the film could be that the highly educated and intelligent have squandered their cultural capital through laziness and individualism, while those who have lost advantages have been left in ignorance to become slaves to their baser instincts. From this perspective, the story is not an endorsement of eugenics. It fits very well within leftist theory. When the perfectly average protagonist (Joe) thinks that his partner in the adventure (Rita), will have an opportunity to time travel back to the past, he tells her, "Go back. Tell people to read books. Tell people to stay in school. Tell people to use their brains, or something. I think maybe the world got like this because of people like me. I never did anything with my life." This point is clear by the end of the film when he concludes, very intelligently, that even the idiots in the idiocracy just have to use their brains and figure out how to solve their problems. It is a matter of communal effort and struggle, not natural endowment.

One of the most poignant, cutting and unfunny jokes in the story comes toward the end when Joe announces he wants to look for a time machine that he assumes might have been invented sometime before everything collapsed. He wants to go back and leave behind the friends he has saved from big agribusiness’ electrolyte drinks but...

Idiot 1: But we still got all these problems.

Joe Bauers: Look, you’re just going to have to solve them yourselves.

Idiot 2: What about the nuc… nucular reactor in Florida? It’s broke and leaky and something’s happening.

Idiot 1: I thought it was in Georgia.

Idiot 2: Georgia is in Florida, dumb ass.

Idiot 1: Hey, I know. Let’s put toilet water on it, huh? Like we did on the crops.

Idiocracy 1:14:50~

Until this point, the characters have been shown to be extremely ignorant of the civilization that preceded them. They think something called the UN (which they pronounce like the word prefix un) “un-nazied the world forever.” But the one thing they do know is that the “nucular” plant built in Florida 500 years ago is still a serious problem they need to deal with. This is only slightly funny because one thing the nuclear industry is seriously concerned with these days is the “loss of competence” within the industry.

As the nuclear industry seems to have no prospects for future growth, it cannot attract young people into nuclear careers. Furthermore, hundreds of nuclear plants in the Western world are to be decommissioned in the coming decades, but who will do this work and who is going to pay for it? There is consumer demand for the electricity produced by a power plant, and this makes it a viable business, but there is no consumer demand involved in cleanup operations. Finally, nuclear accident sites and nuclear waste repositories pose questions about how to inform people of the deep future about what we have left for them. We may easily laugh at the cretins in Idiocracy, but we in contemporary society have nothing to feel smug about. The handling of the Fukushima catastrophe has been pathetic, and recent headlines about “the nucular reactor in Florida” provide their own grim humor:

Scuba diver somehow survives being sucked into Florida nuclear power plant through pipe

Florida nuclear plant that sucked in scuba diver has violated law for a decade
"A Florida nuclear power plant that sucked a scuba diver through its unprotected cooling intake pipe is in ongoing violation of the Endangered Species Act... the plant’s intake system has for decades routinely captured, harmed and killed thousands of marine animals, most notably endangered and threatened species of sea turtle as well as manatees and other protected species."

Study confirms FPL nuclear plant canals leaking into Biscayne Bay
"According to a study released Monday by Miami-Dade County Mayor Carlos Gimenez, water sampling in December and January found tritium levels up to 215 times higher than normal in ocean water."

Other sources:

David Lauchbaum, “Turkey Point Nuclear Plant in Hot Water,” Fission Stories #179, January 6, 2015.

David Lauchbaum, “Hurricane Andrew vs. Turkey Point,” Fission Stories #48, July 12, 2011.