In
1990, the Japanese film director Akira Kurosawa released his film
Dreams
toward the end of his long career. The aim of the project was to put
on film some of the vivid dreams he could recall from his lifetime.
The dreams depicted are joined by a common theme of man's
relationship to his environment, but otherwise this is a collection
of short stories. The film was made in the years immediately after
the Chernobyl catastrophe when both the Japanese anti-nuclear
movement and nuclear industry were expanding rapidly. Perhaps because
it had a strongly anti-nuclear message in the latter part of the
film, Kurosawa found it impossible to raise the funding for
production. It was Steven Spielberg who helped arrange backing
through Warner Brothers.
The
film received mixed reviews at the time, and it is likely that no one
expected the unconventional, surrealistic concept to be a
blockbuster. Regardless of whether you like the film, one of its
segments takes on new significance in the post-Fukushima era. The
segment titled Mount Fuji in Red depicts the
eruption of Mount Fuji which subsequently causes multiple
meltdowns at a nearby nuclear power plant (which would be the now
idled “time bomb” called the Hamaoka
Nuclear Power Plant in Shizuoka prefecture.) The dream follows
two men, a mother and her two children as they flee toward the sea
where panicking refugees are throwing themselves into the ocean
like lemmings. The dream consists of dark humor and illogic (color
coded clouds of radionuclides), which might tempt the literal minded
to dismiss it as nonsense, but, in case it needs to be pointed out,
the artist was trying to get at an underlying truth.
Some
reviewers at the time were withering in their comments:
Time
Out London: Not a little reactionary, the film's main achievement
is to show a once impressive director quite out of touch both with
the world and with developments in cinema. Much of it is like a
moron's guide to the Green manifesto, transforming serious issues
into banal trivia...
Heroic
Cinema: Kurosawa’s message here is as subtle as a brick:
humanity is spoiling the world, with pollution, consumerism and
ignorance.
Entertainment
Weekly: The picture devolves into a series of obscure,
finger-wagging lectures on the subjects of nuclear war, pollution,
etc. Even for those seeking faint echoes of Kurosawa's greatness,
Dreams,
I'm
afraid, is a dud.
The
Washington Post: "Pontifications" might have served as
a more accurate header. Or better yet, "Sermons."...
There's so much uninflected, cautionary preaching, with so much sage
advice being passed down, that you begin to feel as if you're
watching some sort of epic after-school special.
At
the time, it might have seemed over-the-top and hysterical to preach
about a geological event triggering a nuclear meltdown, but now, not
so much. Now that it has happened, and now that the destabilizing
effects of climate change are plain to see, the visions and warnings
of "scientifically illiterate" artists of the past don't seem so easy to sneer at. Tsunamis,
massive earthquakes, floods and drought are real threats to the
world's 400 nuclear power plants. (For
another work of art worthy of mention here, go to The Talking Heads'
Nothing But
Flowers, which appeared about the same time as Dreams.)
A
four-minute segment of Mount Fuji in Red can be seen here on
Vimeo.com but it may not
last. Hopefully, Warner Brothers will consider it fair use for review
such as this, and beneficial promotion for an old film in their
catalog. If you can't view the video, the next best thing is to see
the storyboard series of photos below.
Ironic, no, that Fuji is now making a little noise?
ReplyDelete